What you don’t know …

Sometimes there are precipitous drops (or ascents) in price over a very short period in the market.   Over a short period,  momentum analysis from prices or order flow, is not going to allow one to avoid becoming a casualty — Unless, you have  up-front information or lower-latency access to the event source than most participants.

However, when it comes to information impacting intra-day FX, it is disproportionately known to a small # of players:

  1. large market makers (such as banks in the FX market) have access to significant flow and therefore can have a read on supply and demand for a given asset.
  2. banks also know who their trading-counterparts (customers) are and whether the customer is “smart”,  tending to trade ahead of movements.  They also have a good view on how much size is traded over what period.  This is valuable information that they can piggyback on.

The small HF hedge fund participates on the anonymous venues without access to either of these.    Now a fund may have better models, but still lacks a direct view of the market flows as indicated above.    Whether it be large-flow houses or smart hedge funds, some smaller % of orders represent “smart” or in-the-know money and the larger % will tend to be more reactive.

A Drop

Here is an example of a ~10 pip drop that occurred over a period of 200ms:

The bottom pane contains order-streams for a few bid-side orders of interest in this discussion.   dp is expressed in distance from the inside price (for the bid side this means a larger DP means a lower order price).   By order-streams, referring to implicit cancel/replace activity by a trader (algo).

Notice that the orders have been moved deeper into the book (as seen by a spike in dp) as a defensive move against a falling price.  Looking more closely, this set of orders actually made the move before the drop (aha, “smart” algo working here).

Notice that four of the order streams (green – blue) moved orders deeper into the book ~60ms before the drop and the other colors a ms or 2 before drop but in-time to avoid a fill.

Conclusion

If you don’t have early access to information, look for a participant who does and use appropriately.   This is easier said than done, however. Detecting participants (i.e. order-streams) and determining whether they are “smart” or “dumb” is not straightforward.   I will touch on some of the related problems in a later post, but unfortunately cannot discuss everything in detail.

Advertisements

4 Comments

Filed under strategies

4 responses to “What you don’t know …

  1. Anton

    This is very interesting! Thanks for posting.

  2. Nigel

    Were the traders that moved their orders a couple of ms before the drop reacting to the “smart” traders moving their orders deeper into the book. i.e. were they just following the “smart” money deeper into the book?

    • tr8dr

      No way to know really. The “smart” movements may be any one of:

      – reaction to another “smart” player on another venue
      – reaction to strong bias in client flow (for banks with a lot of client fx order flow)
      – reaction to news (if they are tied to a low-latency news source)
      – reaction to events in other markets
      – other?

      In any case, happy to follow for risk aversion purposes.

      • Nigel

        Thanks for the reply.

        What I meant by my question was that maybe the slower traders (i.e. the ones that only moved their prices a couple of ms before the drop) were following the “smart” traders who moved their prices well before the drop. Maybe this is a illustration of traders following “smart” money.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s